ARTIFICIAL CLOUDS; FACTS AND MYTHS:
The first section of this post is not a matter of personal opinion. These figures are all based on basic established facts and are verifiable.
1 mm of rain per m2 = 1 Lt
1 mm per km2= 1000,000 Lt= 1000 m3
1 m3 of water is 1 Ton
During the recent flood on the East Australian Coast, the area was at least 1000 km long and 100 km wide ie 100,000 km2.
1 mm per 100,000 km2= 100,000,000 m3
1000 mm per 100,000 km2= 100,000,000,000 m3 = ie 100 billion (Bn) m3
1 m3 of water is 1 Ton. 100 Bn m3=100 Bn Tons
In other words, the amount of rain that fell over the Australian East Coast is within the range of 100 billion tons. This amount could have only from 100 billion tons of clouds.
The Calorie is a unit of heat/energy. It represents the amount of heat needed to lift the temperature of 1 gr of water by 1 degree Celsius.
Water does not need to boil in order to vapourise, but it needs energy/heat. To vapourise 1 gr of water needs 540 Calories
To vapourise 100 Billion Ton= 54,000,000,000,000,000,000 Cal
Or 5.4X10(19) Cal
Heat produced in Hiroshima = 1.5X10(13) Cal
This means that heat needed to vapourise 100 Bn Ton of water is 3.6X10(7) ie 36,000,000 more than the heat generated in Hiroshima.
Moreover, total global annual production of energy by humans =
14.8X10(19) Cal
This means that heat needed to create the clouds that produced the flooding is equivalent to 30% of the total human annual global energy production.
The above figures are based on the simplest principles of thermodynamics. I did not make them up.
I will accept scientifically based corrections to the above in case I have miscalculated. But I will not tolerate uninformed groundless criticisms; especially impolite ones coming from ‘friends’.
Humankind does not have the power to create massive clouds, full stop.
Now here is some personal opinion. With all the photos of strange cloud formations, including ones that go straight for hundreds of kms, photos of thick chem-trails and the like, there seems to be evidence that clouds can be steered into certain directions and combined. Furthermore, cloud seeding is an old and developing technology. Moreover, perhaps there are technologies that can trigger off a chain reaction that uses existing natural energy; something akin to how cyclones suck energy out of warm seas water. I don’t know. But all of the videos I saw, and the others that were sent to me by friends, all of the ‘evidence’ provided from Moree and chem-trails etc., do not explain if and how the source of energy that is able to put billions of tons of water vapour in the atmosphere is indeed artificially generated.
The load of an airplane may contain chemicals that can trigger rain from existing clouds, but all the airplanes of the whole world combined cannot carry 100 billion tons.
And if somehow technology has developed to the extent that ‘scientists’ can indeed generate energy equivalent of 36 million times of Hiroshima’s bomb in the Pacific close the Australian seaboard, its impact would have been enormous and not the kind of event that could be hidden.
The claim that floods are man-made cannot be substantiated any more than the alleged theory of man-made global warming and climate change. Ironically however, they have both become political footballs adopted by opposing politics. More ironic is the fact that political proponents of both sides ridicule each other when they are in fact making almost identical (but reciprocal) statements about climate change.
Yes, we need to know that is happening out at Moree. We need to know what the chem-trails are all about. We need honest information and transparency. What we don’t need is paranoia and more irrational conclusions and divisiveness.
No one can overstep the simple rules of thermodynamics, no one. You cannot create energy from nothing. But this seems to be the age of irrationality and talking to brick walls.
No comments:
Post a Comment