TRANS HUMANISM ON STEROIDS? Iman Safi. 17 July 2026

TRANS HUMANISM ON STEROIDS?

Iman Safi 17 July 2026

I want to talk about TNA. TNA is not to be confused with DNA. TNA is a substance that is similar in its structure to DNA, but with big differences. To begin with, TNA is totally synthetic. It's not a naturally-existing substance. It is assumed by some scientists that it used to be the genetic code in earlier forms of life, but we don't know that for sure. What we do know is that existing forms of life do not include TNA in them.

TNA is short for Threose Nucleic Acid. DNA is the Deoxyribonucleic acid. RNA is Ribonucleic acid. So, the natural forms, DNA and RNA use sugars as the backbones of these long chain molecules. In DNA, the sugar is Deoxyribose, and in RNA, the sugar is Ribose. These sugars, Ribose and Deoxyribose, have five carbon atoms in their molecule. There are many types of sugar, for example Glucose has six, Deoxyribose has five carbon atoms and Threose has four.

Now, why does this all make TNA interesting? Because using the Threose backbone, you can build a chain a DNA-like as all you need to do is attach to the same bases of DNA; i.e., adenine, guanine, thymine and cytosine.

These bases, when they are put in such a sequence, will be able to provide instructions for protein synthesis, just like DNA does.

When vaccine technology was emerging, the first step was to isolate a source of a weakened version of the disease in question and inject it into an animal, basically forcing the animal to develop an immunity for it.

Hence you have the antigen and the antibody, but this process takes time, is limited in its capacity, as one needs to extract the vaccine out of the animal’s blood and therefore cannot produce it on a large scale.

When the synthetic mRNA technology was introduced, it could have been used for good purposes and saving lives, but evidently that was not the case thus far.

Synthetic mRNA was supposed to speed up the process of building immunity in the body. Rather than ‘teaching’ the body how to make its own code to produce antibodies, the synthetic mRNA technology, would give the body directly that needed code in order to produce it. In theory this may sound like a good thing.

Pfizer, wanting to ensure this substance remained in the body for a lengthy time, made changes to the natural bases, using a base called Pseudouridine. So when the substance is used to substitute for the naturally-occurring Uracil. it will have the same effect and the synthetic mRNA will function just like the natural mRNA. With that said, when the body enzymes look at it in order to break it down, they don't recognise it as RNA, so they move on, and this is because enzymes in the body are extremely specific. It's a lock and key mechanism. And if the lock changes a little bit, then the key will not work on it. It's very simple. So a slight change in the structure of the RNA makes it invisible to the enzymes (RNA-ases or nucleases in general). This delay in breakdown will give this vaccine of the synthetic mRNA longevity and allows it to stay in the body unscathed for extended periods of time, as normally once natural mRNA has done its work, it gets broken down almost immediately.

Back to TNA, the Threose Nucleic Acid. The structure of TNA is quite different from that of DNA. It is different because its backbone is a completely different sugar. So when it goes past those enzymes that are supposed to break down the RNA, they will totally be blind to it. They won't see it at all. It's something that they are not at all designed to deal with. And it is estimated that it's half-life in the body is 100 to 1000 times longer than that of the synthetic mRNA. In other words, if you inject someone with TNA, with any form of TNA, whether it's good or bad for them, it may stay there for the lifetime of that person. 

Now, imagine, imagine, if there is a ‘nefarious scientist’, looking for something that will make the synthetic mRNA look like a a pistol compared to an A-bomb, and he hears about something like that. Ears will prick up, and the adrenaline rush will put that person on high alert. 

Instead of using the synthetic mRNA, one can use the same sequence, but with a different chemical backbone. The same sequence that they've used, let's say, in the Pfizer COVID vaccine can be employed but built it on a backbone of Threose, rather than Ribose. 

In such an instance, you will get a version of the Pfizer vaccine that can stay in the body almost indefinitely. 

Just like the synthetic mRNA technology, the applications of TNA in medicine can potentially have many benefits, but given that big-pharma is working hard to use the technology in developing ‘vaccines’, then this creates a potentially alarming prospect, even if done properly and with the right intentions. No drug should be allowed to stay in the body for such extended periods.
 
What is more alarming is that no one in the so-called freedom movement membership base is saying anything let alone aware of the potential impending risk. No one in the medical freedom movement is talking about it either. As far as I know. They are busy chasing up some conspiracy theories. They're busy scaring people from things that don't really exist. And this real danger is not something that anybody seems to be interested in or talking about.